[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard

Subject: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
From: "Andy B (Temporary)" <laurelb@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:20:09 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <p.edwards-ya023580001503010917560001@news.unimelb.edu.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:33459


Paul Edwards <p.edwards@its.unimelb.edu.au> wrote in message
p.edwards-ya023580001503010917560001@news.unimelb.edu.au">news:p.edwards-ya023580001503010917560001@news.unimelb.edu.au...
> Question: What happens when one has a 10*2hr trip ticket, and two of you
> are travelling on the tram, and you want to validate the ticket twice (ie
> pay for two fares)?
>
> Answer: PASSBACK flashes up on the validator, and only one fare gets
> printed on the ticket.
>
> I can understand the idea of passback coming up on single use tickets, but
> on those multiple tickets, why, why WHY?

Tickets are not transferrable.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: Bill Bolton <billbolton@computer.org>
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: p.edwards@its.unimelb.edu.au (Paul Edwards)

Prev by Date: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Next by Date: Re: CityRail on-time plan slipping
Prev by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Next by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread