[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard

Subject: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
From: "Wilco" <wilco_@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:43:59 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: The Internet Group (Sydney)
References: <p.edwards-ya023580001503010917560001@news.unimelb.edu.au> <3aaff48a@news.microsoft.com>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:33439

1 ticket = 1 person, 2 tickets = 2 people, etc etc
It is not allowed for tickets to be transfered to another person after
validation.
Should you have been asked by an RPO for your tickets then 1 of you would
have been fined for sure.

1 x 10 x 2hr ticket, going by your theory you could have 10 people riding on
1 ticket for 2 hrs!

> >
> > I can understand the idea of passback coming up on single use tickets,
but
> > on those multiple tickets, why, why WHY?
> >
> > Paul
>
>

References:
- Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: p.edwards@its.unimelb.edu.au (Paul Edwards)
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Mike Alexander" <malex@bigfoot.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Next by Date: RTM and steam. My personal opinion
Prev by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Next by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread