[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: old lines

Subject: Re: old lines
From: "Werris Creek" <werriscreek@bigpond.com.au>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 22:23:37 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
References: <pbQf6.18862$65.93508@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <LsQf6.18882$65.94199@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <YxQf6.18884$65.94187@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:30654


Mark A Zanker wrote
>you are correct of course - what are some reasonable alternatives?
>MAZ
>

Mark

Walking is a good option.

Alternatively talk to some of the preservation groups in the areas you are
interested in.
They should be able to tell you what is advisable and what is not.

Regards

Werris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: old lines
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)

References:
- old lines
  - From: "Mark A Zanker" <zanker@bigpond.com>
- Re: old lines
  - From: "Werris Creek" <werriscreek@bigpond.com.au>
- Re: old lines
  - From: "Mark A Zanker" <zanker@bigpond.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Tempe - Incorrect Signage?
Next by Date: Re: Guards are Cunts
Prev by thread: Re: old lines
Next by thread: Re: old lines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread