[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DSRM is...

Subject: Re: DSRM is...
From: "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 23:21:55 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3AB0D637.6357BC09@excite.com> <3ab13463$0$25486$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <yHas6.61743$lj4.1529301@news6.giganews.com> <98vp6n$vr7$1@news.netmar.com> <a%Qs6.68661$lj4.1803015@news6.giganews.com> <mi%s6.35980$v5.77309@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <992a1u$2rml$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ab55e5d.11964751@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <99ch66$ee1$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <7_Cu6.443$hb.2263@news1.belrs1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3ABB4352.652538F7@ozemail.com.au> <99mnmm$nvd$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ABEE4AC.DFE3500@optushome.com.au> <99mrhj$ofd$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ac8e620$0$25489$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ac904a5$0$25511$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <IXAy6.8833$45.51760@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3acb1676$0$25478$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ACC218C.7DD86BEB@cia.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34307

robson wrote...

> > Given the provision that DSRM and GMR do not comment about the
> > other, I will not comment further.
>
> Wasn't that only for two years?

Yes it was, but both sides seem to be continuing to honour it.

Trevor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DSRM is...
  - From: "Chris" <chrisc@fl.net.au>
- Re: DSRM is...
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Re: DSRM is an absolute joke
  - From: "f.u.i.t.b.e.t" <fuitbet@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: DSRM is...
  - From: "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: DSRM is...
  - From: "Rjaygee" <dartmouthmotel@bigpond.com>
- Re: DSRM is...
  - From: "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: DSRM is...
  - From: robson <robson@cia.com.au>

Prev by Date: RE: [MELB] City Loop issues
Next by Date: RE: [MELB] City Loop issues
Prev by thread: Re: DSRM is...
Next by thread: Re: DSRM is...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread