Re: DSRM is...

["Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>]

f.u.i.t.b.e.t wrote...

> A couple of questions to DSRM members.

> Is it not a fact that the Glenreagh-Dorrigo line was the most expensive
line
> to construct in rail history in NSW?

I think that depends on the definitions applied. It was certainly an
expensive build for a branch line, but it had heavier engineering because it
was intended to be a cross country line.

> Is it not also a fact that it was so expensive and difficult to maintain
> this led to closure?

They were looking for an excuse to close the line. After leaving the line
sit for a decade, it only took a volunteer group 2 years to re-open the
entire line.

> Given  the state of most of the bridges, even the ones just to Megan what
> time frame do you people put on getting trains running just to Megan?

The sleepers are also a problem. The line was re-sleepered just before it
closed in 1972. This was one of the positives which led to us seeking to buy
or lease the line. We are not quoting a time frame for running trains to
Megan. There are sevaral goals which have to be achieved before we even
start to work on the line. Progress currently depends on the amount of money
and labour provided by the membership. Once we establish a cash flow from
the static display we will be able to start accelerating progress towards
opening the line.

> Have you people examined the feasability of running some tours on the
> mainland with the 42 and some cars with the view of raising capital for
> perway restoration only?

We don't see that as a viable option. We are now isolated from the main
line, so moving rolling stock from Dorrigo to the coast is expensive (I am
assuming we would be running out of Coffs Harbour). Storage and maintenance
facilities would have to be established at Coffs. Then there are access
costs, accreditation, crewing etc. 3801 Limited do not seem to have made a
fortune out of the Long Lunch Train and the Cockatoo Run.

> Given all the issues with DRSM it is good to see them preserving all forms
> of rolling stock.

Our primary aim is the preservation of a representitive sample of NSW
rolling stock.

> As for the tank was it purchased to go on a flat top to represent a war
> train?

Yes it was. The Centurion will be displayed on our BME. The Army had a small
number of specialist tank wagons, but not enough for any serious movement.
The railways then supplied BME wagons for tank movements.

We intend to display many of our freight wagons with appropriate loads.
Other examples will be our car carrier, well wagon and container flat.

Trevor