Re: Cityrail don't need guards

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

<thebaron@nospam.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:8ufets$2hdi$1@pc1762.alcatel.com.au...
> I think your worried about nothing. Theres no way you can get rid of
> guards in sydney it just wouldn't come close to being safe. All it
> takes is one look especially at peak times.

It hasn't stopped them trying in the past. Safety doesn't matter, it's cost
cutting that rules. The Glenbrook inquiry may force them to change that
though. Or to be percieved as having changed.

>
> Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
> > "B."
> >> Tezza
>
> >> > And the doors just open and close themselves?
> >>
> >> Of course not.  That's what Driver's are for. |-)
>
>
> > Then they'd get rid of the guards completely. Anyone who thinks they'll
retain
> > the guards indefinitely after giving his duties to the Driver is deluding
> > themselves.
>
>