[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)

Subject: Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:53:54 +1000
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Victorian Railfan Web Site - http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
References: <394A00AE.F5281D1F@ozemail.com.au> <394a17a3$0$509$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8iji37$4nf$1@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> <394DB2F7.891A16C2@ozemail.com.au> <8ikfgt$spd$1@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12608

Stuart Thyer wrote:
> 
> Well without giving too much away no it won't be a triple header, but it
> will have K cars :-P

It's good to hear that it won't be a triple header. I'll probably go on
it now! :-) I'm assuming that it will use R711, R766 and R761?

-- 
- James Brook -

----------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail:     
mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
Victorian Railfan Web Site:    
http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
----------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
  - From: "HXP1" <hxp1@dingoblue.net.au.gunzel>
- Re: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
  - From: "Stuart Thyer" <s.thyer@anatomy.unimelb.edu.au>
- Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
  - From: "Stuart Thyer" <s.thyer@anatomy.unimelb.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: ourimbah
Next by Date: Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
Prev by thread: Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
Next by thread: Re: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread