[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)

Subject: Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
From: "Stuart Thyer" <s.thyer@anatomy.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:45:30 +1000
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: University of Melbourne
References: <394A00AE.F5281D1F@ozemail.com.au> <394a17a3$0$509$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8iji37$4nf$1@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> <394DB2F7.891A16C2@ozemail.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12606



----------
In article <394DB2F7.891A16C2@ozemail.com.au>, James Brook
<ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au> wrote:


>> 
>
>Will it be a triple header all the way or will we get to see the two
>super R's on their own? I prefer double headers instead of triple
>headers, especially on a train of about 10 cars. If it is a triple
>header all the way I probably won't bother with this trip.

Well without giving too much away no it won't be a triple header, but it
will have K cars :-P


Stuart Thyer
Photographer
University of Melbourne

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>

References:
- [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
  - From: "HXP1" <hxp1@dingoblue.net.au.gunzel>
- Re: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
  - From: "Stuart Thyer" <s.thyer@anatomy.unimelb.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
Next by Date: Re: ourimbah
Prev by thread: Re: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?
Next by thread: Re: [VIC] R766's first trip as an oil burner (was: [VIC] Wakool trip, R766 or R711?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread