[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cane: Tramways or Railways?
- Subject: Re: Cane: Tramways or Railways?
- From: "Barry Campbell" <campblbm@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 22:46:06 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
- References: <5pEV4.38652$PL4.809469@ozemail.com.au> <0592bc38.a3ec3c7d@usw-ex0106-048.remarq.com> <3930db13$0$2611@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3934cb09.0@news.topend.com.au> <16bb0c9a.4941d631@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com> <tX6Z4.5456$N4.204852@ozemail.com.au> <077024d0.693d04ac@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com><XTiZ4.20$zQ5.446876@news0.optus.net.au> <B55B1F4D.10092%markbau@altavista.com> <BssZ4.6194$N4.233181@ozemail.com.au> <393656f1.0@news.topend.com.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:11086
John McCandless wrote in message <393656f1.0@news.topend.com.au>...
> > The second type were the numerous shire tramways which ultimately either
>> became part of QR or various sugar tramways or were closed. (The last was
>> the Aramac Shire Tramway which lasted into the 1970s.)
>
><insert nitpick> Didn't the Collinsville-Scotville tramway last till the
>80's? <end nitpick>
>
D'oh! Yes that's true, but it wasn't a shire tramway but an oddity that was
covered by its own legislation.
Barry Campbell