[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No Y2k Bug
Peter Dwyer <peter.dwyer@qr.com.au> wrote in message
853674$mhp16@inetbws1.citec.com.au">news:853674$mhp16@inetbws1.citec.com.au...
> Andrew Price <aprice@mail.dotcom.fr> wrote in message
> voh97sgnl3pfochbl9pkta90t5s7pidp4f@4ax.com">news:voh97sgnl3pfochbl9pkta90t5s7pidp4f@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 04 Jan 2000 22:50:21 -0500, Joshua P. Hill
> > <XXjoshhill@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >On Tue, 04 Jan 2000 18:46:52 GMT, /dev/null@.com (Justa Lurker) wrote:
> > > >But a number of trains run on Windows NT.
> > >Now that is very, very scary!
> > It *might* be, if NT was used in any railway fail-safe applications
> > such as interlockings or ATP systems.
> > But it isn't.
> Yes it is.
Name the system/s. I'm curious.
P.S. he said "fail-safe", so an Office CTC system doesn't count.
--
Mr Notagunzel.
Rail Transportation Connoisseur
notagunzel@bigfoot.com
(Regrets to announce there will be no further moves at
http://www.geocities.com/nota_gunzel
until further notice is issued from this office)