[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Drunk cityrail driver

Subject: Re: Drunk cityrail driver
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:17:08 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: <91k65u$ej$2@pc1762.alcatel.com.au> <91lvjc$m9k$1@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> <3A3EE5FD.5B8C2F2@spin.net.au> <91msld$51d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A40A7E8.72B91264@ozemail.com.au> <92bja4$c8d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a4a971b$0$8122$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:27503

"Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
3a4a971b$0$8122$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a4a971b$0$8122$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...

> If it was done randomly rather than selectively and in private I don't see
why
> not. To be done in private though, the Driver has to stable the train.

Why? If it was only the driver and the tester in the cab, why would the
train need to be stabled? Or are you just creating obstacles?

Dave

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Drunk cityrail driver
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

References:
- Re: Drunk cityrail driver
  - From: Marvin The Martian <choochoo72@spin.net.au>
- Re: Drunk cityrail driver
  - From: David Bradshaw <davidbradshaw@my-deja.com>
- Re: Drunk cityrail driver
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Drunk cityrail driver
  - From: David Bradshaw <davidbradshaw@my-deja.com>
- Re: Drunk cityrail driver
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: NSW TravelPass failures (was Re: Cityrail)
Next by Date: R.T.M. Mystery Tour this weekend.
Prev by thread: Re: Drunk cityrail driver
Next by thread: Re: Drunk cityrail driver
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread