Re: Drunk cityrail driver

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

"Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
EVA26.176555$DG3.3778597@news2.giganews.com">news:EVA26.176555$DG3.3778597@news2.giganews.com...
> "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> 3a4a971b$0$8122$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a4a971b$0$8122$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
>
> > If it was done randomly rather than selectively and in private I don't see
> why
> > not. To be done in private though, the Driver has to stable the train.
>
> Why? If it was only the driver and the tester in the cab, why would the
> train need to be stabled? Or are you just creating obstacles?


It can hardly be done in private if it's done in the cab with people milling
about on the platform trying to have a gawk.