[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 42220
Russell Norton wrote:
> I haven't got stats regarding rail wear. However, rail wear is obviously
> better from these locos (than a loco without computer controlled wheel
> slip), as there is far less chance of going into a violent wheel spin whilst
> stationary, due to the computer control.
So the 90 class I was sitting in doing 120 km/h whilst stationary on Whittingham
Bank never happened?
--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 42220
- From: Bob <alco@acay.com.au>
- Re: 42220
- From: "Russell Norton" <russelln@primus.com.au>
- Re: 42220
- From: markbau1@aol.comQQQQyuk (MarkBau1)
- References:
- 42220
- From: "Ronald BESDANSKY" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
- Re: 42220
- From: "Russell Norton" <russelln@primus.com.au>