[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 42220
David,
You need to tell the full story. On that occasion you were still working
with the testing section and were part of a performance trial that was collecting
data to stop that particular software related fault. A new version of software cured
that problem. If super series is working correctly the wheel spin will be restricted
to 2 revolutions and the control system via the processor will take over. Yes, it
did happen on that occasion but it no longer does.
Cheers
Bob
David Johnson wrote:
> Russell Norton wrote:
>
> > I haven't got stats regarding rail wear. However, rail wear is obviously
> > better from these locos (than a loco without computer controlled wheel
> > slip), as there is far less chance of going into a violent wheel spin whilst
> > stationary, due to the computer control.
>
> So the 90 class I was sitting in doing 120 km/h whilst stationary on Whittingham
> Bank never happened?
>
> --
> David Johnson
> trainman@ozemail.com.au
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 42220
- From: "WhaleOilBeefHooked" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>
- References:
- 42220
- From: "Ronald BESDANSKY" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
- Re: 42220
- From: "Russell Norton" <russelln@primus.com.au>
- Re: 42220
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>