[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bayside windows

Subject: Re: Bayside windows
From: Eddie Oliver <eoliver@efs.mq.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 11:18:48 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
References: <7r704f$crl$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <Pine.SOL.3.96.990909164543.25225D-100000@minyos.its.rmit.edu.au> <37D9F58B.BD98946E@melbpc.org.au> <937144700.762145@diddley.primus.com.au> <7ria85$2l19$1@otis.netspace.net.au>


> >
> From my limited time back on the sparks, I would have to say that of all the
> lines Hillside cover, the worst for vandals, drug pushers, and kids
> travelling late at night (I presume without a ticket) would be the Belgrave
> line, beyond Ringwood.

Why? What are the social or other characteristics of the area which lead
to this?

As a very sweeping statement, in most cities the behaviourally-difficult
areas are those which are (or at least were originally) flat, treeless
and boring - not hilly, treed and attractive like around FTG and
Belgrave.

Eddie Oliver

References:
- Bayside windows
  - From: Daniel Bowen <dfbowen@my-deja.com>
- Re: Bayside windows
  - From: Gareth Lumsden <s9763278@minyos.its.rmit.edu.au>
- Re: Bayside windows
  - From: Jennifer Richmond <richmond@melbpc.org.au>
- Re: Bayside windows
  - From: "Exnarc" <gwrly@netspace.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Longest platform?
Next by Date: Re: Misc. sighting and notice. (Vic)
Prev by thread: Re: Bayside windows
Next by thread: QR stuff
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread