[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Aus rail vs aus rail models



In article <80q100$bln$1@lios.apana.org.au>,
  craigd@lios.apana.org.au (C. Dewick) wrote:
> In <PgPX3.25$h86.546422@news0.optus.net.au> dbromage@fang.omni.com.au
(David Bromage) writes:
>
> >Lambing Flat (bullack@cia.com.au) wrote:
>>> The thing that has struck me about the difference between the two
>>> groups is the dominance of Victorian content of aus.rail and the
>>> dominance of NSW on aus.rail.models
>
>> That is pretty much a reflection on the geographical location of the
>> core group of fans who started each newsgroup.
>
> Well, as the person who started off the creation of both 'aus.rail'
> and 'aus.rail.models', I tend to disagree! 8-)
>
> The predominance of NSW content in 'aus.rail.models' is simply
> because NSW prototype modelling is the most popular, at least IMHO.

That's my opinion too, along with the more generally available NSW
models.  When the AMRM survey results finally appear we might know the
real answer.

JD
--
John Dennis
Home of the Dutton Bay Tramway
http://www.acslink.net.au/~jdennis/dbt.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.