[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aus rail vs aus rail models
- Subject: Re: Aus rail vs aus rail models
- From: "Rod" <comtrain@mpx.com.au>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 21:56:10 +1100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail.models,aus.rail
- Organization: Optus Internet
- References: <FucX3.18814$we.30852@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <382E8209.B91240F7@cia.com.au>
- Xref: netgate.bta.bt.com aus.rail.models:2917 aus.rail:26630
Lambing Flat <bullack@cia.com.au> wrote in message
382E8209.B91240F7@cia.com.au">news:382E8209.B91240F7@cia.com.au...
>
>
> Werris Creek wrote:
>
> > Anyone ever notice how the number of posts to the Aus Rail ng is about
three
> > or four times the number on this ng.
> > A couple of theories
SNIP SNIP>>>>>>>
>
> After what ever many years of Jeff, Victorians are too poor to get
involved in
> modelling and have to rely on full size railways for their enthusiast fix,
as
> observation costs nothing. ;-)
>
> Most modellers model NSW because it is the most interesting system. ;-)
>
> James I wont touch the second part of your theory, But a fast reliable
car, a thick wallet for speeding fines, and again for photographic gear! Do
you realise a Digital camera with 2 meg res and batteries for a long Sunday
can set you back $2500. I think I had more money in my pocket after visiting
Boxcar, than I do now when I leave Microtalk!
Rod ;o)