Re: John Laws

[Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>]

David & Sharon wrote:

> I refuse to remain silent for anybody especially at the suggestion of
> somebody like you who would probably never be able to earn even 10% of what
> John Laws earns in a year.

Funnily enough, heroin trafficers earn over ten times what I do.

Creation of personal wealth is a poor yardstick of ethics behaviour.

> All John Laws decided to do was present the bank's side of the story.... for
> a fee. I don't see anything wrong with that.  

Nope, Ttere isn't - as long as Truckin' John clearly states that he
presenting a paid advertisment. He didn't. 

> It is up to the listening
> public to decide if they are getting a biased point of view and then switch
> off. It is a free world and a free economy.

How is the public to know when John is doing paid commercial propoganda
and when he's just venting on the Issue Of The Day? 

> And don't tell me to remain
> silent. Asswipe.

The word is "arse", you'll find.

> Did you listen to any broadcast by John Laws as he was presenting the bank's
> side of the story? I would say not.

Hardly the issue, David. And please learn to use your editor.

Followups set.

-- 
Robert Kearey           Network Services        
ITS                     University of Queensland
Sentence fragment	I don't speak for my employer