[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ringwood
- Subject: Re: Ringwood
- From: jyfx@optusnet.com.au (Johann Fan)
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 11:57:01 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Remove x to Reply
- References: <7kpfbj$apl$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <7kpibj$9jg$1@toto.tig.com.au> <7kpl6r$f24$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <930120620.108630@newscache.net2000.com.au> <3770AAAA.8AB7BA77@ancc.com.au>
In article <3770AAAA.8AB7BA77@ancc.com.au>, del@ancc.com.au says...
> Notagunzel wrote:
>
> > Methinks it was after the prang at Broadmeadows, where a
> > spark in the Down platform departed past a Mechanical Home
> > at Stop, the reason it was at stop was because the road had
> > been set for n Up Sprinter to preceded the Spark. Therefore
> > the Crossover at the Up end was normal, and the Spark
> > proceeded to motor Up the DOWN line, where it 'found' the
> > next Down waiting at the (I think) last auto. Being a
> > Mechanical Signal, there was no working Train Stop (as was
> > 'normal'), but there was a fixed train stop for up trains
> > just on the up side of the crossover. BUT it had
> > disappeared. And nobody noticed. After that, some/most/all
> > fixed train stops were actually replaced with non-working
> > power trips, just so they could be electrically detected as
> > intact. And that Up Home off No. 2 Platform is now a boring
> > 3 position colour light complete with Train Stop. :o(
>
> How right you are. Darling was done because of this but Broady was
> first.
[snip]
There's still a chunk of metal at the city end of Burnley on the through
line where they placed the "Limit of Shunt" sign
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ringwood
- From: cmgord@ecr.mu.oz.au (Christopher_Martin GORDON)