Re: Oakleigh

[David Langley <del@ancc.com.au>]

Eddie Oliver wrote:

> So back in your court, David. What purpose DOES it serve? The only
> constructive thing I can think of is that it would define the required
> positions for each individual set of points if they were to be set
> individually rather than via the route setting, perhaps because the
> route setting was not responding for some reason???????? Is it a sort of
> diagnostic tool along the lines of "if the route won't set, check that
> the points are in the required positions?"

Yes that is the case precisely.

> That could surely be done by
> commonsense without requiring a pulling list format.

But this is the way it was done in Vic.

David.