Re: Signalling in Victoria

[David Langley <del@ancc.com.au>]

Krel wrote:

>
> >Not necessarily, V29 at Box Hill was from No 6 road. 29 was from No 4, and
> >U29 was from No 5.
> >
>
> response b) This is consistant with the signal ex the lowest numbered
> track (in this case 4 road) having no prefix, the signal with the next
> track (in this case 5 road) having a U prefix and the next track (in
> this case 6 road) having a V prefix.
>
> My guess is that a signal out of the next track would have a 'W'
> prefix. Can anyone confirm or deny?

Agreed. Don't think we had four signals worked from the one lever.

DEL

>
>
> Cheers
>
> Krel
>
> Just another eccentric crank.