[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BLs vs NRS
- Subject: Re: BLs vs NRS
- From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 10:23:47 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Customer of OzEmail/Access One Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
- References: <mauried.276.36EDBEA4@commslab.gov.au> <LxpH2.20$E52.545304@news0.optus.net.au> <36eef3e7.0@nap-ns1> <mauried.278.36EF11C8@commslab.gov.au> <36EF67DD.303087C5@melbpc.org.au> <7cnpm5$70n$2@news.mel.aone.net.au> <36FCFD09.CBB44281@ozdocs.net.au> <7e4rft$rn0$1@toto.tig.com.au> <37068b15.2328944@news.bigpond.com>
gonoNOCRAP@bigpond.com.au wrote in message
<37068b15.2328944@news.bigpond.com>...
>What doesn't have a toilet
The DL's, apparently.
>all the BL's that are certified for lead
>use have retention toilets fitted at the last refit??
Dunno - did they??
DaveP