[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BLs vs NRS

Subject: Re: BLs vs NRS
From: gonoNOCRAP@bigpond.com.au
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 06:14:46 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
References: <mauried.276.36EDBEA4@commslab.gov.au> <LxpH2.20$E52.545304@news0.optus.net.au> <36eef3e7.0@nap-ns1> <mauried.278.36EF11C8@commslab.gov.au> <36EF67DD.303087C5@melbpc.org.au> <7cnpm5$70n$2@news.mel.aone.net.au> <36FCFD09.CBB44281@ozdocs.net.au> <7e4rft$rn0$1@toto.tig.com.au> <37068b15.2328944@news.bigpond.com> <7e6bdh$70h$1@news.mel.aone.net.au>

On Sun, 4 Apr 1999 10:23:47 +1000, "David Proctor"
<daproc@spam_this.umpires.com> wrote:

>gonoNOCRAP@bigpond.com.au wrote in message
><37068b15.2328944@news.bigpond.com>...
>
>>What doesn't have a toilet
>
>The DL's, apparently.
>
>>all the BL's that are certified for lead
>>use have retention toilets fitted at the last refit??
>
>Dunno - did they??
>
yes they did and in any case they had dump to the ground toilets prior
to that and they came from the factory like that!!
regards Paul Johnston (nrc melb)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>

References:
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "Michael" <mk@netstra.com.au>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: gonoNOCRAP@bigpond.com.au
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Preston station torched
Next by Date: Re: Signalling in Victoria
Prev by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Next by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread