[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BLs vs NRS
- Subject: Re: BLs vs NRS
- From: gonoNOCRAP@bigpond.com.au
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 21:43:48 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
- References: <mauried.276.36EDBEA4@commslab.gov.au> <LxpH2.20$E52.545304@news0.optus.net.au> <36eef3e7.0@nap-ns1> <mauried.278.36EF11C8@commslab.gov.au> <36EF67DD.303087C5@melbpc.org.au> <7cnpm5$70n$2@news.mel.aone.net.au> <36FCFD09.CBB44281@ozdocs.net.au> <7e4rft$rn0$1@toto.tig.com.au>
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999 20:57:10 +1000, "Michael" <mk@netstra.com.au>
wrote:
>Graham D Baker wrote in message <36FCFD09.CBB44281@ozdocs.net.au>...
>>
>>And for those long trips they don't even have a toilet on board.
>>
>
>
>Who needs a toilet when you have windows? :-)
What doesn't have a toilet all the BL's that are certified for lead
use have retention toilets fitted at the last refit??
Paul Johnston (NRC MELB)