[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PFZ on IP & WL34

Subject: Re: PFZ on IP & WL34
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 13:15:13 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <01be072a$7726b980$3d2e11cb@rodsmith> <363F047E.346452A@ozemail.com.au> <71orbo$j5u$2@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: news.mel.aone.net.au aus.rail:35295

David "The Doctor" Proctor wrote:

> So, did they hold WL34 at Broken Hill to wait for WL1, that had the PFZ on
> it? If they did this, it staged a remarkable recovery, becvause it was early
> through Blacktown the next morning.

No.

> Or did they do a swap somewhere during the night? [Kiakatoo (no spelling
> flames please) maybe?] Being at night, with crappy lights, might have
> accounted for the failure to get the jumpers connected, etc.

Yes.

--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

References:
- PFZ on IP & WL34
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: PFZ on IP & WL34
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: PFZ on IP & WL34
  - From: "David \"The Doctor\" Proctor" <daproc.remove.spambait@bigfoot.com>

Prev by Date: Leigh Creek Coal.
Next by Date: Re: Will SPI announcements be eventually replaced by DVA? (EOM)
Prev by thread: Re: PFZ on IP & WL34
Next by thread: New Years Eve Transport Arrangements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread