[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Implications of ICE crash

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Implications of ICE crash
From: daproc@bigfoot.com
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 11:38:12 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
References: <6l7t79$p3d$1@gruvel.une.edu.au> <3577D994.E4CC7207@xtra.co.nz> <3578DE42.4192401C@ibm.net>

In article <3578DE42.4192401C@ibm.net>,
  bgreeni@ibm.net wrote:

>Also, at 200km/h, several km would not take many seconds to travel
over, hence
> little time for passengers/cew to react.

Ooooh, I don't know - 200km/h = 3.3km/min

3,300m/min = 5.5 m/sec

Bit different from "several km would not take many seconds" (let the flames
commence!)

Hope this helps!

David "The Doctor" Proctor

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implications of ICE crash
  - From: "Ben Staples" <BenKim@bigpond.com>

References:
- Implications of ICE crash
  - From: dbromage@metz.une.edu.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Implications of ICE crash
  - From: Bill <wguest@xtra.co.nz>
- Re: Implications of ICE crash
  - From: Bruce Greening <bgreeni@ibm.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Sydney trip
Next by Date: Re: Sydney trip
Prev by thread: Re: Implications of ICE crash
Next by thread: Re: Implications of ICE crash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread