[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Start of ARTC.
One of the major problems that ARTC will face in maintaining the track and
improving it , is the relatively small number of trains that run over it,and
the level of track access charges they will realistically be able to levy.
As an example the Melb - Albury track is carrying less than 1/3 of its real
capacity with the current number of trains per day, and there hasnt been any
real sign of improvement , ie more freight going from road to rail.
If the examples of other Track Access authorities are anything to go by, such
as RAC or Westrails equivalent , there is virtually no incentive at all to
spend money on track improvements.
This is one of the great drawbacks of the horizontal integration model.
The rest of the mainline SG Network , with the exception of parts of the
Nth Coast line , is carrying a woefully small number of trains per day ,
compared with its theoretical capacity, especially the TAR & the CAR, which is
effectively the main source of ARTCs potential revenue.
Effectively what we have ended up with , is yet another Govt rail authority,
looking after a small subset of the national network,over which there are less
trains running.
The initial concept of a National Track Access authority , which was a good
one , has really been lost.
cheers
MD