[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Metcard Private Ticket Inspectors

Subject: Re: Metcard Private Ticket Inspectors
From: paul@xenu.ee.mu.oz.au (Paul Dwerryhouse)
Date: 17 Dec 1998 11:42:14 GMT
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organisation: alphabetical
Organization: Computer Science, The University of Melbourne
References: <365b5974.0@139.134.5.33> <73fpu7$6bs$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <01be240d$38161a60$0c2e11cb@rodsmith> <759n7q$i5i$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net>

"David Proctor" <daproc.spambait@umpires.com> writes:

>Roderick Smith wrote in message <01be240d$38161a60$0c2e11cb@rodsmith>...

>>Once a ticket is valid, it should never need to be 'revalidated'.

>Why is it that Victorians have a problem with validating a ticket on every
>boarding? 

Because it is redundant.


--
Paul Dwerryhouse                                        paul@xenu.ee.mu.oz.au
"The growing use of e-mail, not to mention Web-page publishing, threatens to 
reverse the trend towards illiteracy among the supposedly educated without at 
the same time improving their spelling". -- Michael Swaine, Dr. Dobb's Journal

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Metcard Private Ticket Inspectors
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc.spambait@umpires.com>

References:
- Re: Metcard Private Ticket Inspectors
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: Metcard Private Ticket Inspectors
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc.spambait@umpires.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Overland cars for West Coast Rail
Next by Date: Re: Bluebirds are go?
Prev by thread: Re: Metcard Private Ticket Inspectors
Next by thread: Re: Metcard Private Ticket Inspectors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread