[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers

Subject: Re: Re: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
From: "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 20:03:12 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: The University of New South Wales
References: <9d62ir$8p9$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <9d8ff7$pca$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au> <3af938ad$0$25473$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <9dbias$7sf$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <uqmift83k7atcnuekrc9fibrprlvpmth22@4ax.com>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:37156


"David Johnson" <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
uqmift83k7atcnuekrc9fibrprlvpmth22@4ax.com">news:uqmift83k7atcnuekrc9fibrprlvpmth22@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 9 May 2001 23:59:22 +1000, "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
> wrote:
>
> >So what happens when R33 gets driven around? Half the train is Tulloch
cars.
> >
> >btw, only one car is not series 1 Comeng/Tulloch out of all the 6 in
> >R33...might I say, this might be set with the combination of all oldest
> >possible cars.
>
> If it has C3805 in it, we should launch it into the harbour!

What's such a problem with C3805?? Although it's no doubt one of the crappy
series 1 Comeng cars...

References:
- [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
  - From: "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
- Re: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
  - From: "E.P" <nathan1@ihug.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
  - From: "f.u.i.t.b.e.t" <fuitbet@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
  - From: "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
- Re: Re: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: ID boards (nsw)
Next by Date: ASSCO WEBSITE Updated
Prev by thread: Re: Re: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
Next by thread: RE: [NSW] Anti-Tulloch carriage aus.railers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread