[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Metcard Adventures (Was: [Melb] Fare evasion)
- Subject: Re: Metcard Adventures (Was: [Melb] Fare evasion)
- From: amorton@mudguard.ee.mu.oz.au (Anthony Morton)
- Date: 21 Mar 2001 23:32:41 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Dept. of Elec. Eng, University of Melbourne
- References: <RBFq6.10331$0N3.68084@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3ab751df$0$25514$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3AB7767C.F89A3864@ozemail.com.au> <WR_t6.1113$hU1.235326@news4.aus1.giganews.com>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:33351
Dave Proctor <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>People travelling at short notice should be, and are, subject
>to certain penalties compared to those who can plan ahead. Otherwise those
>who *can* plan ahead will leave it to the last minute, and there will be no
>advantage to planning ahead.
This is rubbish. If I drive a car, I suffer no penalty for not planning my
journeys in advance. I just jump in the car and drive away. Of course I
make sure there's always petrol in the tank, but that's just a matter of
stopping off and filling up once in a while - I don't have to go out of my
way to do this.
Exactly why should people be penalised for not planning in advance, just
because they use public transport instead of driving a car? There is no
inherent cost to the system from passengers who travel at short notice, so
why charge more? I don't comprehend your point of view. Is there perhaps
some dire moral hazard involved in permitting people to travel at the drop
of a hat? If so, we should be setting the thought police onto people who
jump into cars without planning ahead.
Tony M.