Re: Does not commute: CityRail's shame file

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

"Chris Downs"
| Tezza <
| > "Chris Downs"
| > | Tezza
| > | > "Chris Downs" | >

| > | > | These were CityRail's worst services not the average.  Strange how
| > | > | CityRail didn't give figures for the best!
| > | >
| > | > They did according to that article. "As State Rail bosses prepare to
lobby
| > | > to increase fares by an average 3.3 per cent from July, they have
released
| > | > data which shows the 20 worst and 20 best services, and the strategy
they
| > | > hope will fix the problem."
| > |
| > | "The best services were, in the morning, the 6.05 from North Sydney
and the
| > | 6.21 and 7.04 from Hornsby and, in the evening, the train due at
Turrella by
| > | 5.33.  Otime percentages were not given" - 5 paras later from the SMH
article.
| >
| > You complained they didn't provide figures for the best, the article
says
| > they did. You didn't say anything about on-time percentages.
|
| For one who preaches a need for improved comprehension in your aus.rail
| postings your ability to bastardise context is laudable (do I need to
| elucidate on the context of laudable?).

You complained they didn't provide figures for the best services. When I
pointed out that they did you then specified a different requirement not
first mentioned.