[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Melb] New trains?

Subject: Re: [Melb] New trains?
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:23:25 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <ve7l6.40837$o85.218735@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3A9502C4.6EA9328C@ozemail.com.au> <3a9505c6$0$25474$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <905166172gunzelT333@139.130.239.94> <3a965486@news.alphalink.com.au> <90517F32CgunzelT333@139.130.239.94>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:32150

Michael wrote:

> I'd be interested to see from the perspective of someone whose ridden on
> narrow guage suburbans and standard guage suburbans how they compare in
> ride quality.

I find the QR suburbans very smooth, but I'm convinced that is due to their
superior trackwork.  Even IMUs travelling at 140 km/h are far smoother than
anything in NSW, due to track condition.

--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Melb] New trains?
  - From: "David Bennetts" <davibenn@ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Re: [Melb] New trains?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [Melb] New trains?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: [Melb] New trains?
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
- Re: [Melb] New trains?
  - From: "Ben" <smithb@alphalink.com.au>
- Re: [Melb] New trains?
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)

Prev by Date: Re: [Melb] New trains?
Next by Date: Re: [Melb] New trains?
Prev by thread: Re: [Melb] New trains?
Next by thread: Re: [Melb] New trains?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread