[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who maintains the ELs.

Subject: Re: Who maintains the ELs.
From: "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:25 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Deja.com
References: <3a60f3ad.12125744@can-news.tpg.com.au> <3a6111ae@news.hunterlink.net.au> <3a617f31$0$15480$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a622068.1806809@can-news.tpg.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28587



> Thanks for the very good explanation Peter.
> Your comment that the ELs are a very popular loco is interesting as
> initially they were offered to NRC for free and were rejected.

Only NRC didn't want them. FA/ATN adore them.


> Maybe its time that CFCLA asked Goninans to build some more.
> You could make a very good freight loco by dropping the narrow guage
> traction motors and putting in the bigger 752 AG motors.

I lost hope with CFCLA, they would probabily order something from China
rather then locally.


--
Cheers

Railway Rasputin


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

References:
- Who maintains the ELs.
  - From: mauried@tpg.com.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: Who maintains the ELs.
  - From: "Al Barrett" <ajbarrett@hunterlink.net.au>
- Re: Who maintains the ELs.
  - From: "Pete Kilburn" <juneejct@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: Who maintains the ELs.
  - From: mauried@tpg.com.au (Maurie Daly)

Prev by Date: Re: White Bay power station and Menangle Milk siding
Next by Date: [SA/WA] Australian Railroad Group official homepage
Prev by thread: Re: Who maintains the ELs.
Next by thread: Re: Who maintains the ELs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread