Re: Railway Digest Jan 2001

["f.u.i.t.b.e.t" <fuitbet@yahoo.com.au>]

You have the intellect of a split pea a green one at that.
What an unpleasant uneducated piece of caravan-dwelling dog excrement you
are.
PISS OFF
"Tony Gatt" <baulko@optushome.com.au> wrote in message
a3wb6.802$Db.2444@news1.belrs1.nsw.optushome.com.au">news:a3wb6.802$Db.2444@news1.belrs1.nsw.optushome.com.au...
> pity YOU haven't worked out how to use the Grammar check.
>
> Hate to even think what your initials spell, but I'm sure we could come up
> with a few variations...
>
> please go troll somewhere else,
> (I'll be so glad when the children go back to school, then this guy might
> stop posting!)
>
> "f.u.i.t.b.e.t" <fuitbet@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> 3a6d6919$0$16402$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a6d6919$0$16402$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> > Geez Derek not even a spelling mistake this time.....so you have finally
> > worked out how to use the spell checker!!!!
> > "Derek Rogers" <DekRogersnospam@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> > G09b6.7976$65.46739@newsfeeds.bigpond.com">news:G09b6.7976$65.46739@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> > > James
> > > Sorry for the delay in responding.
> > > I concur with what David Johnson has said (thanks Dave).
> > >
> > > However, the submission of web photos is a tricky issue. I suppose in
> the
> > > end it depends on the overall impact of the photo versus just how
widely
> > it
> > > has been viewed on the internet. Not an easy question I know.
> > > Like a lot of things in publishing, it is fraught with compromises.
> > > We at RD strive to present images that have not appeared elsewhere
> though
> > > for one reason or another, occasionally there are lapses.
> > > I'll leave it up to contributors although as a courtesy, perhaps those
> > being
> > > submitted to the magazine could be labelled if they have appeared
> > > on any websites.
> > > Regards
> > > Derek Rogers
> > > Editor - Railway Digest
> > >
> > > David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> > > 3A6704BD.2B64F3AA@ozemail.com.au">news:3A6704BD.2B64F3AA@ozemail.com.au...
> > > > James Brook wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Erk wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't fully read it yet but it looks good. Does this now
mean
> > that
> > > you
> > > > > > can send in photos via email and don't have to worry about
sending
> > in
> > > your
> > > > > > original photo or getting a reprint?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sounds good to me!
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As I understood it, the e-mailed photo is simply a preview so the
> > editor
> > > > > can see if the photo is worthy of inclusion in RD. If they would
> like
> > to
> > > > > use it then they ask you to send in a high resolution photo on a
zip
> > > > > disk. If my interpretation of this is wrong then could someone
> > (Derek?)
> > > > > please correct me.
> > > >
> > > > That sounds about right.  The full size image will be 300 dpi CMYK
> TIFF
> > > file,
> > > > amounting to around 40MB.  Derek may also accept jpg files, then
> convert
> > > them to
> > > > TIFFs himself, better ask him. :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > David Johnson
> > > > trainman@ozemail.com.au
> > > > http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > These comments are made in a private
> > > > capacity and do not represent the
> > > > official view of State Rail.
> > > > C.O.W.S. Page 11.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>