[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New trams

Subject: Re: New trams
From: spammers-will-die@austux.net (Jeremy Lunn)
Date: 29 Apr 2001 12:27:53 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@cwo.net.au
References: <6PwF6.403$c01.14589@ozemail.com.au> <9c65vl$2gk$1@merrick.home> <oVFF6.11528$482.54765@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3ae7dc74$0$25479$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <slrn9ek4ic.ji.spammers-will-die@amalthea.dark.net> <ndpG6.22997$BU4.37903@news1.blktn1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <9cf9lo$545$1@merrick.home> <3aeb5a03$0$25469$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.0 (Linux)
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:36027

In article <3aeb5a03$0$25469$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>,
James C. wrote:
>> it remains to be seen how long it will last. I'm sure the operators would
>> split it up if they had the chance).
> 
> I think they all know if they didi that it would discourage passengers.

They don't need to do that.  It's already subsidised enough.

I just wonder how they make a profit with all the fines they get (in
particular NE).

-- 
Jeremy Lunn
ICQ: 19255837
http://jeremy.austux.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New trams
  - From: Daniel Borowski <boffa@NOSPAMaltavista.net>

References:
- New trams
  - From: "Michael Doyle" <doyles05@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: New trams
  - From: Paul Dwerryhouse <paul+usenet@dwerryhouse.com.au>
- Re: New trams
  - From: "DL" <D_Lindstrom@Bigpond.com>
- Re: New trams
  - From: spammers-will-die@austux.net (Jeremy Lunn)
- Re: New trams
  - From: "Glenn J-B" <grjb@optushome.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [NSW] Near fatality - Windsor Station
Next by Date: Re: [NSW] Near fatality - Windsor Station
Prev by thread: Re: New trams
Next by thread: Re: New trams
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread