[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
- Subject: Re: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
- From: "Paul Jones" <dj_wiseguy2@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:43:45 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <3AC28AFB.96485DC5@fang.omni.com.au> <3ac2928c$0$25475$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ac3048e$0$25491$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <HFDw6.108616$lj4.3180362@news6.giganews.com> <3ac596e8@news.alphalink.com.au> <zlax6.112188$lj4.3349189@news6.giganews.com> <3acc09ae$0$25464$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3acc7668_3@news01.one.net.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34416
Yes, i noticed it also. They used to be lovely and quiet, not not any
more...
__p.j
"Brendan" <nadnerb_2000@nospam.start.com.au> wrote in message
3acc7668_3@news01.one.net.au">news:3acc7668_3@news01.one.net.au...
> (his personal opinion was that the Rattlers would outlast
> > the Endeavours).
> >
> I fully agree with that. I rode on an endeavor a few years ago and was
quite
> impressed with it's performance (it was still new at the time). Just six
> months later, a ride on an endeavor was louder, slower off the mark, and
the
> vibration of the engine was maddening. Regular commuters probably wouldnt
> have noticed it but the endeavors seem to have deteriorated very quickly
>
>