[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
- Subject: Re: Endevours vs Explorers [was Re: $50 million for new trains in Hunter]
- From: "Brendan" <nadnerb_2000@nospam.start.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 23:43:23 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <3AC28AFB.96485DC5@fang.omni.com.au> <3ac2928c$0$25475$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ac3048e$0$25491$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <HFDw6.108616$lj4.3180362@news6.giganews.com> <3ac596e8@news.alphalink.com.au> <zlax6.112188$lj4.3349189@news6.giganews.com> <3acc09ae$0$25464$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34309
(his personal opinion was that the Rattlers would outlast
> the Endeavours).
>
I fully agree with that. I rode on an endeavor a few years ago and was quite
impressed with it's performance (it was still new at the time). Just six
months later, a ride on an endeavor was louder, slower off the mark, and the
vibration of the engine was maddening. Regular commuters probably wouldnt
have noticed it but the endeavors seem to have deteriorated very quickly