[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan

Subject: Re: Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan
From: "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:50:37 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
References: <U%EP5.33$rd2.3046@news0.optus.net.au> <3a0fa5ae$0$19432$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:24292

In article <3a0fa5ae$0$19432$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>,
  "William Pearce" <ben_issacs@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>     But there is still no sign of anything being done to provide rail
access
> to the container terminal at Webb dock,

May have something to do with the cost....it would cost 50m$ to restore
this line because of the Colonial Stadium block the original right of
way. A new bridge would needed to reconnect the line.

--
Cheers

Railway Rasputin

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan
  - From: Yuri <steam4me@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan
  - From: "B." <gunzel412@dingoblue.gunzel.net.au>

References:
- Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan
  - From: "William Pearce" <ben_issacs@optusnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: RTM 19th Century Treasures
Next by Date: Re: Union Selling Out Yet Again.
Prev by thread: Re: Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan
Next by thread: Re: Rail traffic gets boost in `inland port' plan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread