[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTM 19th Century Treasures
- Subject: Re: RTM 19th Century Treasures
- From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 20:14:01 +1100
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Victorian Railfan Web Site - http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
- References: <9AcG5.47$N7.4925@news0.optus.net.au> <39e967f5$0$11609$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <39e97ece@grissom> <39e9c904$0$11609$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <39EAFAD6.72ABAB5D@cia.com.au> <39ea5645$0$11607$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <qFyG5.2862$e5.6990@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <971694293.293019@unity.swspn.net.au> <39ec2ec2@fl.net.au> <971863652.100296@unity.swspn.net.au> <8ttrna$og1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <dSRM5.15115$SF5.329993@ozemail.com.au> <aepc0t8v1anq7pu0h3jn9nuakvbrr8mgkl@4ax.com>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:22596
Bill Bolton wrote:
>
> "Robert Lee" <robsl@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> > I agree with everything Craig says, BUT...... the RTM (of which I'm a member
> > and supporter) receives no recurrent government funding.
>
> Niether does the Sydney Tram Museum, which has still managed to house,
> maintain, restore and progressively bring up to operational status an
> extensive collection, while undergoing a site relocation in the
> process.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the tram museum have a smaller
operational collection when compared to the RTM? (BTW, I think both
groups do an excellent job with the resources they have)
--
- James Brook -
----------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail:
mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
Victorian Railfan Web Site:
http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
----------------------------------------------------------------