[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why keep Clyde?

Subject: Re: Why keep Clyde?
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:05:35 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3A09EAF2.2F7C7EB1@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com> <3A0A06DB.2A06228E@mailcity.com> <8udmgg$8u6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:23992

maikha_l@hotmail.com wrote:

> (By the way, any of you who have travelled past there may have noticed
> two Southern Auroura (Or those 60's Interstate cars) passenger cars
> outside the workshop,

AK cars.

--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.

References:
- Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Peter Degotardi <peterdeg@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Marvin The Martian <choochoo72@mailcity.com>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: maikha_l@hotmail.com

Prev by Date: Re: Electrification and patronage
Next by Date: Re: Cityrail don't need guards (Was: [OT] Rod-o-matic (was: [OT] ideal file size of a jpeg or gif image))
Prev by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Next by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread