[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Interesting thought for Vic City Loop Trains (was something about m**car*)

Subject: Re: Interesting thought for Vic City Loop Trains (was something about m**car*)
From: "Scott Beecham" <snoa@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 18:45:21 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <392798F4.CAFF3E1B@yahoo.com> <392A6B44.B5DC82DE@werple.net.au> <8gla1m$mqt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <392E3205.76AB7C73@alphalink.com.au> <UEqX4.2$vW6.533@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:10396


HXP1 <hxp1@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
UEqX4.2$vW6.533@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net">news:UEqX4.2$vW6.533@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net...
> Chris Gordon <cmgord@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
> 392E3205.76AB7C73@alphalink.com.au">news:392E3205.76AB7C73@alphalink.com.au...
>
> > Hillside Trains will be re-branded "Connex" as a directive from head
> > office in Paris.
>
> "Connex Trains Melbourne" (CTM) is one version of the story I've heard.
>
> Is the Sydney Light Rail trading as "Connex Trams Sydney" yet? |-)
No they are trading as Metro Light Rail for both the light rail and
monorail.

References:
- [VIC] Closed Metcard Barriers
  - From: Sam Eades <eadess@yahoo.com>
- Re: [VIC] Closed Metcard Barriers
  - From: Roderick Smith <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Interesting thought for Vic City Loop Trains (was something about m**car*)
  - From: Eric Cartman <erk_cartman@yahoo.com>
- Re: Interesting thought for Vic City Loop Trains (was something about m**car*)
  - From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@alphalink.com.au>
- Re: Interesting thought for Vic City Loop Trains (was something about m**car*)
  - From: "HXP1" <hxp1@bigfoot.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Approach to Sydney Central
Next by Date: Re: OK silly question..
Prev by thread: Re: Interesting thought for Vic City Loop Trains (was something about m**car*)
Next by thread: Re: [VIC] Closed Metcard Barriers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread