[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New questions for rail experts

Subject: Re: New questions for rail experts
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 03:11:17 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Another Optus Customer
References: <392a7311$0$2628@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8gf6r1$9tr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <392B3FF8.7605803@alphalink.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:10073

"Chris Gordon" <cmgord@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
392B3FF8.7605803@alphalink.com.au">news:392B3FF8.7605803@alphalink.com.au...

> If you have enough train stops, overlap, and prove the train is going
> slower than the correct speed (as outline above, and Melbourne has
> something Similar in the City Loop, at Kooyong, Gardner for the
> tram/train level crossings, Ringwood, Heidelberg, Cheltenham, and maybe
> a few others) then there is no need for catch points on the main line.

What protection will trains not fitted with trips have?

Dave

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New questions for rail experts
  - From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@alphalink.com.au>

References:
- New questions for rail experts
  - From: "Greg Cantori" <greg@mpx.com.au>
- Re: New questions for rail experts
  - From: signal_spotter@my-deja.com
- Re: New questions for rail experts
  - From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Tangara, how many of the cars are powered in a set? was Re: Alstom for Hillside/Yarra tram [Melbourne Aust]
Next by Date: Re: New questions for rail experts
Prev by thread: Re: New questions for rail experts
Next by thread: Re: New questions for rail experts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread