[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: home signal

Subject: Re: home signal
From: "Bret" <nil@mail.spectrum.com.au>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 07:57:09 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CITEC
References: <390fba62$0$31504@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8eqoln$k16$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8er1jp$th9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8er40m$9i20@inetbws1.citec.com.au> <39116EE4.1ACF5FB7@ozemail.com.au>
Reply-To: "Bret" <nil@mail.spectrum.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:7875


David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
39116EE4.1ACF5FB7@ozemail.com.au">news:39116EE4.1ACF5FB7@ozemail.com.au...
>
> Then they also have "poor man's bi-directional" which has only one signal
in the
> wrong running direction (so there can be no following movements).
>
This is known as "Simplified Bidrectional " (SIMBID) and is not meant for
timetabled moves.

References:
- home signal
  - From: "Tom" <hammerheads@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: home signal
  - From: signal_spotter@my-deja.com
- Re: home signal
  - From: Neil D B <anb727@hotmail.com>
- Re: home signal
  - From: "Bret" <nil@mail.spectrum.com.au>
- Re: home signal
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [NSW] Airport Link
Next by Date: (OT)Re: Darwin port to be expanded.
Prev by thread: Re: home signal
Next by thread: Re: home signal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread