[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: home signal

Subject: Re: home signal
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 22:36:52 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <390fba62$0$31504@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8eqoln$k16$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8er1jp$th9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8er40m$9i20@inetbws1.citec.com.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:7850

Bret wrote:

> In QR any line which is signalled in both directions is "bi-directional".
> The track section described above as "bi-directional" would be called
> "duplicated bi-directional" up here.

Then they also have "poor man's bi-directional" which has only one signal in the
wrong running direction (so there can be no following movements).



--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: home signal
  - From: "Bret" <nil@mail.spectrum.com.au>

References:
- home signal
  - From: "Tom" <hammerheads@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: home signal
  - From: signal_spotter@my-deja.com
- Re: home signal
  - From: Neil D B <anb727@hotmail.com>
- Re: home signal
  - From: "Bret" <nil@mail.spectrum.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: What about the b***dy train crew?!
Next by Date: Re: High Speed Chicken Tests
Prev by thread: Re: home signal
Next by thread: Re: home signal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread