Re: March Railway Digest

["Derek Rogers" <DekRogers@nospambigpond.com>]

Firstly, thanks for advertising that the thing
is out and available. I missed making my
regular posting this month. (BTW subs were
posted last Friday (3/3).

Secondly, please read the magazine more carefully
before you seek to boost your ego by
sprouting your obvious glee in finding a
alleged error in a publication: the report
actually says:
"It is believed that resleepering was carried
out . . ."
If there is now more information
available about the said working, then well
and good but be man (or women) enough to
submit it and not hide behind an email facade.

If this info had been made available to us with
all the other contributions, we could have
followed it up in time for the March
edition.

I remind you that Railway Digest relies
essentially on unsolicited volunteer
contributions from around
Australia for its monthly
traffic reports.

Regards
Derek Rogers
Editor - Railway Digest

<jumboman@my-deja.com> wrote in message 8a5cmu$bk1$1@nnrp1.deja.com">news:8a5cmu$bk1$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> "The Paterson Correspondent" in the lower North Coast report has got
> it wrong again. In the March issue of RD, it was reported that on
> Monday 24/1, resleepering was carried out in the Kilbride-Wallarobba
> section by a train made up of 39 wagons,including NDGF's,NDXF's and
> NPZH's. This train was push pull through Paterson,with 8240/8110 and
> 8109/8152.
>
> What in fact this train was,was a test train for the new high speed
> weighbridge at Wallarobba,and other new weighbridges in the lower
> Hunter.
>
> 442.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.