Re: Ararat seeks public's view of planned rail restart

[Tony Gatt <baulko@tig.com.au>]

Thats not true.. 60 months is a long time, surely they could do it in 48
months?

Michael Kurkowski wrote:

> ender2000@my-deja.com (Vaughan Williams) wrote in
> <8itbps$7ab$1@nnrp1.deja.com>:
>
> >
> >> You could also divide some trains at Ballarat and send a car to
> >> Maryborough.
> >
> >Yes please.
> >
> >Where do I sign?
>
> Here, here here here, here and here. Here, here, here, here, here here,
> there, here, there, there, here and there. Oh and I forgot, there.
> Congratulations, you have now signed the bureaucratic approval form for the
> government to send in it's consultants to spend 60 months deciding if
> people will catch the train or not. At the end of this 60 month consulting
> period, if the consultants decide that the idea is feasible, another study
> funded by the road lobby will take place as a further and final feasibility
> study. If this is approved, you will be lucky to see one Sprinter per week
> each way for a period of 12 years along with a 136 page agreement stating
> that services are not to be increased more than the rate of inflation.
>
> Have a nice day, thankyou for choosing Bureaucracy Victoria.
>
> Michael
>
> --
>      Email: michael {DOT} kurkowski {AT} gunzel {DOT} net
>           (Any mail sent to usenet.spam@gunzel.net
>        will be filed into the circular filing cabinet)
>     Web: http://www.netstra.com.au/~mk ICQ: 1459118 / T333.
>               Yahoo: VR_T333  Mobile: 0416-044-124
>
>    "VKC to all units, Warning to all units, there is a gunzel
>          on the loose, approach with EXTREME caution!"

--
Thanks,

Tony Gatt.

________________________________________________________

  How do I set my Laser printer to "Stun"?
________________________________________________________

Personal Website: http://homepages.tig.com.au/~baulko/
Railway Website:   http://www.railpage.org.au/railpix/
________________________________________________________