Re: mixing loco parts

[Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>]

Dave Malcolm wrote:

> >Re the controversy on using parts of R704 on R700  - it should be recalled
> >that one of the biggest parts ie. the boilers were routinely swapped in
> >service - thus 3801 ended up with boiler 3819 I think. 3801 has parts from
> >3804, 3810 and 3813.  Does anyone know why "3813" is painted on th rear
> >lower side of 3830s tender?

> It probably is 3813's tender. The tender on 1210 in Canberra is No 32, which
> was a 14 class.

[Twilight Zone music]

So ... which 38's tender is the one at Dorrigo, what I thought was
3813s?

> Dave Malcolm

-- 
Robert Kearey		Remote Access Group
ITS			University of Queensland
My poor Krell!		I don't speak for my employer