Re: 3526 anyone?

["Dave Proctor" <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au>]

James Brook wrote in message <389A4D9D.214B0126@ozemail.com.au>...
>chris@enet21.com.au wrote:
>
>> I know this will start a long debate again, By why doesn't the RTM grab
Pendennis
>> Castle, its ideal for main line running and much cheaper to restore an
maintain than the
>> 57 or probably the 35. I bet sponsors would like it too.
>
>The 35 or 57 is more historically appropriate for Australia. Why would you
rather see a
>foreign loco running instead of an Australian loco? What is the point of
the NSWRTM
>preserving something that isn't a piece of NSW history?

The same *could* be argued about Zig Zag Railway (although I won't).

Dave