[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3526 anyone?

Subject: Re: 3526 anyone?
From: "The Railway Rasputin II." <bob@fastlink.com.au>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 20:38:23 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.rail.australia-nz
Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct
References: <3896b104@occy.pnc.com.au> <3897c4c5@occy.pnc.com.au> <878k8f$olu$1@merki.connect.com.au> <C8Rl4.51$i33.547964@news0.optus.net.au> <87afm0$dp4$1@metro.ucc.usyd.edu.au>



Matthew Geier wrote:

> 
>  What the RTM is worried about isn't its speed, as much is how much wear
> of the running gear will occur.

No but RAC is!

rgds

References:
- 3526 anyone?
  - From: "Darren Yates" <dyates@pnc.com.au>
- Re: 3526 anyone?
  - From: "Darren Yates" <dyates@pnc.com.au>
- Re: 3526 anyone?
  - From: "Rod Gayford" <rjaygee@smartchat.net.au>
- Re: 3526 anyone?
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: 3526 anyone?
  - From: matthew@mail.usyd.edu.au (Matthew Geier)

Prev by Date: Re: SL15/16 via Junee Triangle not station (Semi Long Junee Report)
Next by Date: Re: [VIC] Hurstbridge line, working museum?
Prev by thread: Re: 3526 anyone?
Next by thread: Re: 3526 anyone?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread