[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Melb] Old railway line

Subject: Re: [Melb] Old railway line
From: David McLoughlin <davemcl@NO***damned***SPAMiprolink.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:08:09 +1300
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Problematic
References: <OvyU5.144923$e5.82273@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3a22edf6@news.iprolink.co.nz> <n1GU5.145148$e5.83680@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3a234029@news.iprolink.co.nz> <3a2418b9@news.iprimus.com.au> <3a243b12.65907755@nntp.unsw.edu.au> <3a2569e9@news.alphalink.com.au> <3a27f1a7@news.alphalink.com.au> <3a276844$0$19429$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a27ff12@news.iprolink.co.nz> <3A280FB6.B4FCF986@netspace.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:25936

Peter J. Vincent wrote:

> David McLoughlin wrote:

> > An occo?
> >

> occupation

Okay, thanks, but that doesn't explain to me the context, which was
about trains being stored on a siding during an "occo."  What was
occupied? Apart from the disused APM siding? Does the term have some
wider meaning, like, eg, "demo" has? Are we talking about trains having
to be parked somewhere unusual because some protest has "occupied" their
usual yard, or something like that?

David McLoughlin
Auckland New Zealand

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Melb] Old railway line
  - From: "Peter J. Vincent" <pjv101@netspace.com.au>

References:
- Re: [Melb] Old railway line
  - From: "Ben" <smithb@alphalink.com.au>
- Re: [Melb] Old railway line
  - From: "B." <gunzel412@dingoblue.gunzel.net.au>
- Re: [Melb] Old railway line
  - From: David McLoughlin <davemcl@NO***damned***SPAMiprolink.co.nz>
- Re: [Melb] Old railway line
  - From: "Peter J. Vincent" <pjv101@netspace.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: SOT - Solution to Westbus Problem?
Next by Date: Re: [Melb] Old railway line
Prev by thread: Re: [Melb] Old railway line
Next by thread: Re: [Melb] Old railway line
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread